August 05, 2004

pangea? i hardly know her

8/5/04

I'd like to talk about something that has been creeping me out for a long time. Of course you know the topic: I'm talking about PANGEA.

pangaea.gif

Fans of tectonic plate shift (party mothafuckas in the house say HO!) know what Pangea was – the time in the Triassic period when all of the continents gathered together on the Equator and got to know each other really well. I'm all for brotherly love, and god knows Africa and South America's relationship is downright sexy, but Pangea totally gives me the heebie-jeebies.

pangeaglobes2.gif

First off, I hate the distorted way North America looks on all the Pangea maps, like a twisted version of the continent I've grown to love. It is rather ironic that New York City was once attached to Morocco, but the queasy liquidity of it all – dunno, it just makes me uncomfortable.

Secondly, isn't there something a little existential and despondent about being on Earth, looking out over the ocean, and realizing that there's nothing on the other side of the world but yourself? One of my favorite things about being on the beach in California is knowing that Australia is somewhere far over the water. On Pangea, the only thing over the vast ocean is the back of your own ass.

Sure, there were great things about Pangea. The Second Collision of the Appalachian Oregeny created the sloping mountains we inhabit in upstate NY. And if it weren't for all those dinosaurs eating tropical ferns in West Virginia (you know, back when WV was on the Equator), there'd be a lot of coal miners out of a job.

But I don't mind telling you Pangea makes me more than a little unnerved. What's worse, it wasn't the first time the continents all got together, and it won't be the last! Apparently we have Pangea Ultima to look forward to, when New York will be stuck with freakin' Namibia. I was Namibia during the Model U.N. in high school, and it sucked!

GrtngsBrooklynPangea.jpg

Posted by irw at August 5, 2004 11:09 PM
Comments
Posted by: CL at August 6, 2004 03:43 AM

Are we going to have to start using the metric system? Forget it!

Posted by: oliver at August 6, 2004 06:13 AM

Yeah, but just don't you go dissing Gondwana Land.

Posted by: Steven Garrity at August 6, 2004 06:41 AM

Up with metric! While you're taking the leap - let's go with metric time too.

How do you think Prince Edward Island feels in Pangea? We're a left-over dribble...

Posted by: Alan at August 6, 2004 06:58 AM

Ah, PEI is a johnny come lately sand bar that had to wait for Pangea to break up to be formed in the run-off. The southern half of Nova Scotia was part of Africa and a late departer - hence the Annapolis Valley. I think that explains a lot. I really do.

Posted by: PanFan at August 6, 2004 07:01 AM

We at Pangea thank you for your interest in our organization. As the so called "continents" begin their journey back to wholeness, we will be your one-stop shop for products to help you adjust to your new climate, new neighbors and the shifting terrain beneath your feet.

Pangea: Bringing People Together

Posted by: jkuhne at August 6, 2004 07:09 AM

While all of this may invoke queasiness in your heart, geotechnical engineers and engineering geologists like me embrace it as job security. I get hot cockles upon hearing 'large unstable land mass-'

Posted by: David Ball at August 6, 2004 08:54 AM

Hey Jody--Shout out from DB.

And I love the comment from PanFan, whoever you are.

Posted by: Just Andrew at August 6, 2004 10:18 AM

beware:

subduction leads to orogeny

Posted by: Liam at September 24, 2007 05:17 PM

i'm very interested in all this, but i keep asking myself if there was a massive supercontinenet, how was is formed in one big mass, and not little pieces scattered around? someone help me! i cant think of a logical explination!

Post a comment





(We won't show it.)




Remember personal info?