April 12, 2005

not with a bang but a whimper

4/12/05

There has been so much obsession with the Apocalypse lately: the mini-boom in Revelation-based books, the ravings of the End of Days Christians, movies, TV shows and just about every pundit harping on Armageddon as though it were some kind of cool parlor trick. I have to say, I don't quite get the allure.

There's two kinds of apocalypses – the religious kind, and the secular kind. In the religious scenario, God descends upon the Earth, or Jesus, or somebody, and all of us rigid agnostic types are forced to eat crow, slap our heads and say "shit, if only we'd listened to the MORMONS!" There's much gnashing of teeth, a lot of judgments, electronics stop working, and I'm sure it's incredibly well art-directed.

The other kind would suck. A secular apocalypse would be some sort of nuclear meltdown, an environmental shift or a massive virus that wipes out life as we know it. This would take a fairly long time, as the last survivors eke out a dreadful existence, breathing their last in a cruel winter, all hope and joy utterly demolished. This is the far more likely scenario as apocalypses go, and pardon me for repeating myself, but what exactly the fuck is so cool about that?

Either way, why are we so presumptuous as to believe we're the ones to get the End of Days? Crazy Christians never fail to amaze me; they think they're so fucking special that God would have to make an appearance on their watch.

I refuse to believe that the end of the world is that arbitrary. It would also be tremendously unfair – I'm still in my thirties, for Christ's sake. Shit, the baby in Tessa's tummy is negative-three days! Why do WE have shoulder the fucking apocalypse? Furthermore, why do people seem so psyched to get it all over with?

Obsessing about the End Days is like meeting God and pissing on his leg. If you dig on Armageddon, you are truly beyond the reach of modern entertainment and should try self-flagellation or sensory deprivation tanks. Leave life for the living, and leave the springtime to those of us who still appreciate it every time it comes.

Posted by Ian Williams at April 12, 2005 10:05 PM
Comments
Posted by: Killian at April 13, 2005 04:10 AM

Thank You! And my particular pet peeve is the "Left Behind" book series that has insinuated its way into (many) Christian reading/discussion circles. YIKES. If stuff like this actually ENCOURAGED agency (let's get rid of poverty, violence, degredation, etc. on OUR watch, before the end of the world) that would be one thing, [I don't even care IF people did good stuff just to get to "Heaven"---good stuff would be getting done] but it doesn't seem to work that way.

anyway, I liked the cheer from the last comment on the last post---ending with "push that baby out" ! Go, Tessa, Go!! Love to you Three. Sacred OR secular, the end of the world could not POSSIBLY happen before the beautiful Peanut arrives. THAT would just be wrong, wrong, wrong!

Posted by: Kevin at April 13, 2005 06:08 AM

And I thought I was the only other person in the world who has gotten sick and tired of this crap as well. . . . As I think on it, it must be very depressing to be one of these Chirstian Conservatives/American Taliban types: So afraid of life and all that is has to offer in the way of art, music, literature, film, not to mention love of your fellow man/woman, but also so petrified to meet the maker that they claim loves THEM so much and hates all of us heathen devils for our philandering ways. (Please see the recent Terri Shiavo protests to see a perfect example of the fear exuded by these people) The End-of-Days-ers who try so hard to prech to and convert/rebirth people like only sour me religion as a whole and convince me further that it truly is a gateway psychosis. Ian, any headway on getting "American Coastopia" up and running?

Posted by: LWB at April 13, 2005 06:33 AM

Piffle.

"I refuse to believe that the end of the world is that arbitrary. It would also be tremendously unfair"

Ignoring the contradictions there, I've heard you say some things on the basketball court that would make you a PERFECT candidate for a front-row seat to the End Times.

I was just down in Amish country for Brent Cox's wedding, an then saw Kingpin the next day. Now those people are beyond the reach of entertainment.

Speaking of which, can I put in a request for why the Amish piss you off in a blog soon? I do think you have some good points there, English.

Posted by: Ehren at April 13, 2005 06:44 AM

Actually, I'm not Christian at all and I find the idea of the Rapture and the whole world of Revelations to be interesting and rather exciting as a source of fictional narrative. I mean, it's kind of thrilling to see earthquakes eat up LA or to see comets hit the earth or whatever. For me, it's a similar thrill to what I would get watching War of the Worlds or even Lord of the Rings.
The only problem is all the extremist right-wing hysteria that goes along with the Left Behind books, like the antichrist turning out to be the head of the United Nations. But can you honestly say you don't see the appeal of disaster movies? Of end of the world sci-fi/fantasy?

Posted by: Ehren at April 13, 2005 06:45 AM

The AMISH?!?!?!!?!??!

AAAARARRRAAARRGHHHGHGHGHGHGH!!!

Posted by: cathie at April 13, 2005 07:36 AM

ok, as your resident professional christian, i cannot keep myself from commenting.

first, you don't get why people are attracted to the violent aspects of the end of the world scenerios?? please see every action movie ever released in july. beyond the reach of entertainment??? try right in the middle...

second, like most things in the bible, the apocalypse has been mined of its sensationalist aspects and drained of its truly religious ones - namely that it is a quite beautiful vision of the return of eden, with the city of jerusalem shining in the middle - a tribute to humanity's work in God's world and a promise that God will gather every living creature in redemption - 'wiping every tear from every eye'

hardly a scenerio of hatred or judgment, but a sign of hope and humanity.

which is what i need when i see so much secular AND religious perversion of what i dedicate my life to.

Posted by: Warrior of the Woods at April 13, 2005 07:52 AM

I was busily clicking away on a rambling, wordy comment about the Jungian apocalypse archetype when Cathie posted her well-thought-out comment.

Well said!

On the secular side, too, the collective vision of apocalypse is more about rebirth than it is about dying.

In the words of Bruce Springsteen:

"Everything dies, baby, that's a fact
But maybe everything that dies, someday comes back..."

I can understand why you wouldn't be receptive to such a concept right now. :-)

Love to all in your house.

Posted by: Piglet at April 13, 2005 09:10 AM

The definitive commentary on the Book of Revelation is "Apocolypse", by DH Lawrence.

The thesis in a nutshell is that Christianity would never, ever have caught on based on the Gospels. Return love for hatred, turn the other cheek, and all that Sermon on the Mount stuff? No, people need a religion that Kicks Ass! they want to see the world destroyed, the heathens eternally torture while repenting too late, and MASSIVE wailing and gnashing of teeth. It's not enough for the meek to inherit the earth; they need to look down and see all the bare-bellied sneetches suffering, while they themselves urinate on them from on high.

That's why Revelations, and not the Gospels, are the essence of modern christianity.

Posted by: Laurie from Manly Dorm at April 13, 2005 09:16 AM

Bay-bee! Bay-bee! Bay-bee!

Posted by: Ehren at April 13, 2005 11:56 AM

Regarding Mr. Of The Woods' quotation of Mr. Springsteen, I always thought that we are supposed to take that line, which is spoken by the doomed narrator to the woman he loves, as an empty sort of promise that we and the Boss know will never really come to pass.

Posted by: CL at April 13, 2005 12:04 PM

....Bay-bee! Bay-bee! Bay-bee!...

Posted by: Chris at April 13, 2005 01:59 PM

D.H. Lawrence is the author of the "definitive commentary" on the book of Revelations.

The one.

My Lord is that funny.

Posted by: Piglet at April 13, 2005 02:10 PM

All right, I lied. The real final answer is Tim LaHaye's.

Ya happy now?

Posted by: KJF at April 13, 2005 02:35 PM

amen to that! didnt we already suffer through a mini-apocalypse in november 2004. thats enough for one lifetime. and just one more comment from the peanut gallery......ba-by, ba-by, ba-by!!!!

Posted by: Dave at April 13, 2005 02:50 PM

Hey - does "negative three" have a hidden meaning? oh... say... forced labor?

Posted by: Emily at April 13, 2005 04:31 PM

If this helps, I was the first born in my family and was SEVEN days late. But my mother also claims that I was by far her easiest delivery (out of four).

Posted by: Andrew at April 14, 2005 04:33 AM

Odd. Thursday morning...no new blog...must mean baby is on the way.

Posted by: lil' dixie vitale at April 14, 2005 04:41 AM

Baby! UNC!
Baby! where do it be?
Baby! Hip, Hip, Hooree,
baby! UNC!


Posted by: Laurie from Manly Dorm at April 14, 2005 05:00 AM

Hmmm -- no new entry. It is about time! Hope Ian brought his laptop to the hospital with him! Details! We want details!

Posted by: Killian at April 14, 2005 05:39 AM

thursday morning-still no baby--
wah, wah,wah!

Posted by: CL at April 14, 2005 06:41 AM

Yeah, definitely...things are happening.

Good luck, guys!!!!!!!!!!

Meanwhile, we'll talk amongst yourselves. Laurie, Andrew and Dixie, I hope you have a delightful day today.

Posted by: CL at April 14, 2005 06:42 AM

Oh, and Killian, etc., too.

Posted by: kent at April 14, 2005 07:03 AM

I agree with you, but, that "Revelations" series is the bomb! It's as hokey as that California falls into the ocean show, and it has screaming demons of hell! Or at least scenery chewing of biblical proportions! And a hot Nun.

You better believe that the followers of Ozzie and the Heavy Metal Nation are all OVER this miniseries. 2 Devil's Horns Hand Gestures Way UP!

Posted by: Laurie from Manly Dorm at April 14, 2005 07:42 AM

Thanks CL. You have a lovely day, too.

We could all place Internet bets on the details of Peanut's arrival!

Here are my guesses --
Name: Caroline Blake-Williams
Size: 7.9 lbs, 21 inches
Hair: flaming red
Duration of labor: 15 hours
Manner of arrival announcement: water broke
Drugs or no drugs?: After 11th hour of labor, one epidural administered

Posted by: Coach Dean Smith at April 14, 2005 08:12 AM


Ian:

Coach Gut turned me on to your blog...he's an avid reader. I appreciate the kind comments about me and the Tar Heels over the years.

I'm a little concerned about your jaundiced view towards Christianity. I share your concerns about the so-called "Moral Majority"

For a different perspective, I'd invite you to visit the Binkley Baptist Church the next time you are in Chapel Hill. Our website is http://www.binkleychurch.org/.

Anyway best wishes with your new child and Go Heels.

Sincerely,

Coach Dean E. Smith

Posted by: Annie at April 14, 2005 11:23 AM

How will we find out if the above is THE bona-fide Dean? We'll have to start watching our language!

Posted by: kevin at April 15, 2005 12:51 PM

I'm pretty sure it is he by the Binkley link.
Congratualtions to you three and we look forward to hearing more details. k

Posted by: Mike Krzyzewski at April 15, 2005 02:37 PM

It fucking isn't Dean fucking Smith, be-fucking-cause he doesn't fucking know how to use the fucking internet and wouldn't fucking call Bill Guthridge fucking "Gut" if he fucking did.

Find out more at http://www.coachk.com

Fuck.

Mike

P.S. Congratufuckinglations, Ian and Tessa!

P.P.S. Sponsored by http://www.thetruthaboutduke.com

Posted by: Warrior of the Woods at April 16, 2005 10:25 PM

Could it be Coach Smith?

It causes me to shiver.

I've gotta believe....

Post a comment





(We won't show it.)




Remember personal info?