October 9, 2008

witch burns, film at 11

10/9/08

At this point, John McCain, Sarah Palin and the cretinous Republican anal pustules that enable their endless vitriol need to fucking stop. Right now. Ever since Palin's effluvious post-convention "bounce" evaporated, their behavior has been cowardly, unhinged, and deeply un-American. Someone has to sit them down and tell them to FUCK OFF for the good of the country.

I'm all for a good political catfight if the exchange of ideas – however heated it might be – ends up helping the country make an informed decision. But the McPain campaign is indulging in the kind of hate-filled, not-even-bothering-to-be-subtle rhetoric that might turn their wingnut base into an orgy of ecstatic rage, but makes the rest of the country want to take a shower. A high tide raises all ships, but conversely, a campaign like McCain's drags all of us into the festering pit of despair.

Barack Obama has, for most intents and purposes, won this election. Only two things can stop it now: the unthinkable, and mass voter registration purges across the country. In past contests, candidates facing an seemingly-inevitable loss have gone down gracefully – think Bob Dole in 1996, Mondale in 1984. Not McCain and Palin, however. They are the retreating Huns who lose the battle, but want to make sure they leave blankets infected with smallpox strewn across the countryside.

obama_billboard1.jpg
from your friends in West Plains, MO

Their ugliness is everywhere, from Cindy McCain's shrill bullshit to Sarah Palin's constant assertion that Obama is no better than a terrorist. And their rallies have become breeding grounds for the worst kind of knuckle-dragging fuckwads this side of a Klan rally. There are lots of videos out there, but this one really encapsulates their ugly, bigoted, snarl delivered behind fucked-up teeth. These are the motherfuckers who cut you off on the freeway, and then give you the finger as they speed home to beat their kids.

Am I a classist? I suppose so, I don't really care. This brand of American is wholly reprehensible - they're not just embarrassing for conservatives, they're embarrassing for all of us. Being poor, misinformed or desperate does NOT excuse ANY OF US from the tenets of basic human decency. Just as rich people are not allowed to buy their way out of morality, poor people don't get an exemption for their hate.

But all of this ugliness belies a vastly more sinister undercurrent; McCain and Palin are working their devoted followers into an unrepentantly dangerous lather. By freely using the word "terrorist" (by themselves and from audience members), tolerating shouts of "kill him!" at their rallies, and delivering utterly racist soundbites about Obama "diminishing the prestige of the United States presidency", they are inspiring the worst people in America to the kind of fury that begets lone gunmen and ragtag basement militias.

If you think I'm overreacting, try asking some of the older blog readers here, the ones that remember things I don't, about the summer of 1968, or November 1963. We've got a black man about to be President, and his rivals, knowing full well they are about to lose, are purposely riling up their thugs for revenge, whether it's this month or at some point in the next few years. Even if you think the threat is remote, the behavior of the Republican ticket is close to irresponsibly criminal.

I was talking to someone who had a great idea: if Barack Obama is elected, Sarah Palin should be forced to be on his secret service detail for all public events. That way she can truly know what it is to be the wolf and not the chopper pilot, and doggone it, it might not be so fucking funny anymore.


Posted by Ian Williams at October 9, 2008 11:27 PM
Comments
Posted by: PalinBaby Question at October 10, 2008 12:36 AM

[removed due to lack of class -ed.]

Posted by: Triangleheel at October 10, 2008 5:23 AM

I'm on board with you Ian- but I think it is like pissing in the wind at this point. They aren't going to stop- what do they have to lose? McCain will never run again and likely won't seek re-election to the Senate in 2010. Palin has enough problems with all of these probes, and I'm not sure how they are going to keep records hidden after the election about the child, trooper-gate, etc. This is the all-or-nothing effort and it stinks like a DOOKIE.

However, I am going to give the American people some credit as it seems polls have shown they are not in favor of this type of campaign. At the very least, those independents or undecideds are not caving to this type of tabloid sensationalism.

The real question I was having with some friends last night is this: if Obama wins and turns the economy around in a fashion like Clinton over the next 8 years- what reasonable person would EVER vote Republican again? Some insane reason to trash a country and have another Dem come to the rescue. We are in dangerous territory of John Galt hiding the "smartest people in America" (as McCain said his commission on Medicare would have) in a valley somewhere and letting these McCain-iacs go to hell and a hand basket. And frankly, I wouldn't blame them.

BTW- 7 short days to the beginning of practice! GO HEELS!

Posted by: Schultz at October 10, 2008 6:12 AM

Ian- there are kooks and cretins on both sides. You just happen to present what is convenient to your argument.

A lot of Republicans like me are angry because Palin has been put through the ringer. But your candidate gets a free ride without having to address:

1. His relationship with Ayers
2. His involvement with ACORN
3. His 20 year plus involvement with Wright
4. His relationship with that crooked SOB Frankie Raines

I know that Obama's election will not mean the end of the world as we know it. I am comfortable with him leading our country if he is elected.

But I hope that he will address these issues in his 30 minute network TV ads that he purchased. I really think this could be to his advantage and it would quell a lot of the anxiety out there. Jis sayin.......

Posted by: Anon at October 10, 2008 6:26 AM

Shultz, you must not have been paying attention during the Democratic primary.

The fact that McCain and Palin have the gall to essentially call a sitting US senator a terrorist is so far beyond the pale that I am (almost) speechless. They will do anything -- ANYTHING -- to win. And McCain in particular should be ashamed. His legacy will be forever tarnished.

Posted by: Schultz at October 10, 2008 6:32 AM

Calling Obama a terrorist is absurd and ridiculous. I totally agree with this.

Did McCain and/or Palin actually say this verbatim?

Posted by: Jody at October 10, 2008 6:44 AM

Obama had a pretty stress free visit to Western NC, only a few protesters and whatnot. I was frankly proud of the reception he got in Eric Rudolph land.

Posted by: Bud at October 10, 2008 6:47 AM

I totally agree, Ian.

What I admired about John McCain before this election campaign was that he was willing to rise above partisanship to accomplish things he believed in, that he respected his opponents enough to rise above personal attacks and that he appeared to have a very low tolerance for bullshit. While I often disagreed with him on issues, I admired the way he worked.

When I got to know Barack Obama, I recognized this straightforward honesty in him, too. Because I agree with him almost entirely on issues, my choice for President was easy.

This campaign started as a refreshing change from TUB (the usual bullshit), with both candidates actually playing fair. But the further McCain has fallen behind, the more he has discarded what I admired about him. Lee Atwater may be long gone, but his legacy lives on in McCain's campaign. Maybe it's not so much McCain himself, but his advisors. Maybe he really is out of touch.

Either way, it's disappointing.

I agree 100% that fairness goes both ways. Obama has continued to conduct himself honorably in the face of unrelenting lowball bullshit. He has fought back, he's called bullshit where bullshit needed to be called, but he has measured his responses and hasn't escalated the negativity. I admire the way he's conducted the campaign.

By the way, I'm not sure who posted the first comment, whether it was (as I suspect) a McCain supporter hoping to discredit Obama or whether it was actually a misguided Obama supporter. Either way, Ian, I suggest that you remove it.

Posted by: Anne at October 10, 2008 6:51 AM

Ian, you say what many of us are thinking.

Politics is always (apparently) dirty business, especially in a close race. But it hurts in a visceral way to see a particular campaign fanning the flames of hatred. No (Shultz), McCain and Palin may not have stated exactly that Obama is a terrorist. But their remarks open the floodgates to those sorts of vile generalizations on the part of their supporters. Ian has shown us just two examples. Every time Palin speaks, she provides more of the same. To call her a pitbull is to insult half of the genetic heritage of the very sweet dog that is sleeping at my feet right now. "Reeking troll" is more like it. Oops, I just got dragged into the swamp! Sure is easy to resort to gratuitous insults in this political climate. I will retreat to my elitist aerie now.

Posted by: Ehren at October 10, 2008 7:00 AM

Watching video clips of rallies for the candidates on both sides, it's really chilling to see how awful things are getting from the right. Racial epithets, people screaming "kill him!" It's all really awful. Someone (maybe Andrew Sullivan) compared it to the tenor of things before Rabin was assassinated.

Posted by: Schultz at October 10, 2008 7:07 AM

So who is ready to run for public office???!!!!!

It really is getting bad and I'm afraid, with the Republicans getting desperate, it is going to get worse.

Posted by: jersey at October 10, 2008 7:24 AM

craghill/caveman in 2012

Posted by: bridget at October 10, 2008 7:26 AM

schultz

Palin's been put through the ringer? really? Interviews with those tough investigative journalists Gibson and Couric constitute the ringer? or maybe the Tina Fey sketches are the ringer. You may not like what Palin looks like when being asked follow-up questions, but that's hardly the ringer. For the most part, the media has not dug too deeply into Palin's record or misstatements.

Obama went through a very tough primary fight with a formidable opponent in Clinton who did bring up Wright and Ayers. These associations were dug into by the media. They were asked about in debates by the moderators. Again, you might not like that there's not more blame to be attached to Obama, but it's been dug into. (As has Rezko.)

What fascinates me is this obsessive focus on these three individuals in Obama's history - Ayers, Rezko and Wright. These are cited as if Obama's the only politician EVER to have questionable associations. And from all that I've read - Obama does not have any culpable interactions with these men. Their crimes/views are their own not Obama's.

All politicians have questionable associations. Please - like McCain doesn't have any questionable associations in his 26 years? Charles Keating is just one that jumps out. From what little we know of Palin she has questionable associations with 2 pastors (the witch doctor pastor and the Jews for Jesus pastor) and with an anti-American group in the Alaskan Independence Party.

What's going on right now at these Republican rallies is scary. McCain-Palin are fomenting rage. Where is it going to go?


Posted by: mom at October 10, 2008 8:01 AM

Here's my problem: I passionately believe in freedom of speech. But Palin, in rousin' the rabble (you betcha), is tantamount to yelling "fire!" in a crowded theater. She is inciting the crazies to accomplish the "unthinkable," and I for one will be amazed if it doesn't happen. With her encouragement.

I remember the string of tragedies in the 60s, and at the time, one of my neighbors. after the King assassination, said "there is so much ugliness in the world..." And of course, there still is. I do have faith in the vast, vast majority of Americans, and in the beauty and hope of the great American "Experiment" that is our imperfect but amazing democracy. When MLK was killed, Ian, still a baby, rode on my hip at a silent King Tribute march in San Jose, Calif. The crowd I walked with was probably over half white, with many Latino, Asian, and of course African-Americans, and it felt like a proud statement of what America could (and has come to) look like. The march was peaceful and sad, but with a hard core of determination to make a statement about what most Americans were feeling.

I don't want to march like that again. One crazy person can change history and make an ugly difference, Sarah Palin... Shame on you and the moose you rode in on. Time to talk about what can be done to bring our country back from the brink, what we can sacrifice and work toward... not this ugly crap coming out of your mouth. Time to stop it, and stop encouraging some angry, frustrated, demented person to do something "unthinkable."

Posted by: Annie H. at October 10, 2008 8:08 AM

What McCain and Palin are doing right now is appalling...sickening...beyond belief. I agree with Bud that initially--well, really a few years back, before he started embracing GWB--McCain seemed like someone who really thought for himself and I respected him for that. But these desperate last-ditch scrapes from the very bottom of the lowest barrel have fully annihilated whatever respect I once had for him. McCain (to my knowledge) has not out and out called Obama a terrorist, but how different is it, really, to repeat over and over that Obama is "close" (untrue) to Ayers, who is "a terrorist! A terrorist!" Do you really think he expects his emotionally exercised audience NOT to make that connection somehow?? And Palin...her gall is truly unbelievable. She needs to start examining the plank in her own eye. These two have sunk below any decent human standard.

Posted by: Schultz at October 10, 2008 8:12 AM

Sorry- we should just agree to disagree on this.

But I readily admit that Palin deserves much of it because of her newness to the national political scene.


Posted by: Lyle at October 10, 2008 8:30 AM

Ehren -- Interesting point regarding the tenor before Rabin was assasinated. Since he was murdered by one of his own tribe, a young hardliner who felt that Rabin had been betraying the Zionist cause, for a similar scenario to play out in this case (cross fingers, knock wood that one doesn't), one of these presidential candidates would have to be done in by a disgruntled member of his own party. Judging from the most frequently observed emotions and behavior at the parties' respective rallies, maybe McCain should take out extra life insurance.

I hope it doesn't come to that, of course. It's just something to ponder...briefly...before I pack up my luggage to fly back to the States with my baby this coming Monday, to introduce him to his grandparents and to participate in early voting...IN FLORIDA. Karl Rove can kiss my grits!

Posted by: wottop at October 10, 2008 8:35 AM

The first post should be erased. Stupid garbage. I'm way more worried that she has no business as VP than whom is the mother of the child.

I watched the videos:

The guy who was so upset about the ACORN stuff probably has no idea what it is all about. I looked it up online. ACORN sounds like it took a good idea and went insane. Shameful stuff. Does that stain Obama? Hard to say.

The people who say he is a terrorist because his name "sounds muslim" need to calm down. Why don't they just say they would never vote for a n****r and be honest? They are showing their ass in public and they still think their pants are up.

Maybe the camera should have found the minority folks in line? Surely there was one or two that would stand shoulder-to-shoulder with these dipsticks.

Hate, these folks are all about hate. I realize there are some real winners on the other side too. How can the Dems not figure out a way to appeal to the middle 50% of the political spectrum? Are we as a country as mean as the folks in the video? Are we that scared? Do we hate our fellow [yet different] citizens that much?

Holy Hell!

Posted by: dean at October 10, 2008 9:13 AM

In keeping with my post from earlier this week, I am not going to throw any bombs. But, you liberals should ask yourselves the following question honestly:

If Palin or McCain had served on a board with, been friendly with, worked alongside, etc a gentleman (and wife) who had bombed several abortion clinics 30 years ago, would it be a big deal?

Of course it would. Would it be a MAJOR FRIGGIN' DEAL? I don't know, but it would be a big deal.

dh

Posted by: wottop at October 10, 2008 9:18 AM

dean, it would be. It would be because most Dems are pro-choice. I really don't think the label "terrorist" would be so easily put on either.

Posted by: D at October 10, 2008 9:29 AM

McCain opposed increased criminal and civil penalties for clinic bombers. That's a pretty big deal.

Palin supported a political party that wants to secede and has ties to white supremacists. That's a pretty big deal.

Posted by: Sean at October 10, 2008 10:51 AM

http://www.forscotchlovers.com/

Here you go!

Posted by: Ian at October 10, 2008 11:02 AM

Again, no offense, but the conservative commenters on this blog are pretending that both sides have equally shameful elements. It's like that scene in "Monty Python and the Holy Grail" when John Cleese storms into the medieval village, kills half of the men and women, and then the father of the bride says "Oh, let's not bicker about WHO killed WHO..."

The Republican ticket is tacitly inciting violence. People at their rallies are openly racist and scream things like "kill him!" There is NOTHING anywhere NEAR that coming from the other campaign. To engage in this when people in America are in such financial dire straits? Putrescent.

Posted by: kevin from NC at October 10, 2008 11:50 AM

I just can't wait to pull that lever in Novemeber.. that is long time for now and I suspect it will get uglier.

I have been watching video coverage of the crowds in Palin/McCain rallys. I have been able to count the non-whites in the crowd with the fingers on one hand and i have looked very closely...and that includes the carefully placed individuals behind the podium that both candidates select.

Posted by: Neva at October 10, 2008 11:57 AM

To brighten this gloomy day I suggest everyone check this out..
http://www.newsobserver.com/lifestyles/
Congrats Greg on the new CD and lovely article about you. I can't wait to hear it. Might try to make it to Shakori on Sunday but will have to drag at least one child along.

Posted by: Anne at October 10, 2008 12:53 PM

Would everyone who keeps writing "through the ringer" PLEASE use the correct noun? -- It's "through the wringer." Like the one on an old-fashioned tub washing machine. Google it if you have no idea what those are.

Once, I could ignore it. Twice, and my eyes started bleeding. Occupational hazard. ;-)

Posted by: Schultz at October 10, 2008 1:04 PM

Sorry Anne. Guilty as charged!

Posted by: Zel M. at October 10, 2008 1:17 PM

Wow. So much for the kinder, gentler blog that Dean tried to usher in earlier this week. I had to double check that I was on Ian's blog and not on Daily Kos.

I will now resort to the line that has been thrown out many times on this blog during this political season: Do you really believe what you are writing? Though I vigorously disagree, I can concede to you your world view of hard-core right wingers as knuckle-dragging, wife-beating, mouth-breathing neanderthal closet racists. That's your right to see the world through your own eyes.

But do you honestly in your heart of hearts believe the GOP in any shape, form, or fashion is trying to stir up the level of animosity and rage that would somehow bring harm to Obama?

Look, it's 4th and long and McPalin is trying to throw a hail mary, throwing all kinds of things against the wall to see what sticks. But to insinuate that they are trying to ramp it up to the level of assasination is ridiculous.

I also think it is intellectually dishonest to somehow imply or assume that the left does not have its own supply of spoonheads like those in the videos cited above. There are plenty of people out there in the "there's a vast right-wing conspiracy" crowd who cite stuff just as crazy as Obama being linked to terrorism. Remember, apparently Bush knew about 9/11 and sabotaged the levees in New Orleans. And Sandra Bernhard suggesting Sarah Palin would be gang-raped by black men (by any men!) isn't misogynisitic, hate-filled speech, regardless of the supposed context?

And before you go launching the preemptive strike on voter fraud, it now appears the entire Dallas Cowboys offense has registered to vote as Democrats in Nevada. Besides, wasn't the Chicago Democratic machine the originator of how to steal elections, a playbook run well by JFK? So please, get off your high horse and stop asserting that your side is not full of just as much shit as the other side.

In no way am I defending McPalin. Their campaign reeks of desperation. But, unlike your assertions, this is not 1968. This is a time in America when a black man can be a major party nominee and be the odds-on favorite to win it. Would someone want to hurt Obama simply because of his melanin content? Sure. But its not the Repubs who are going to make that happen. Hell, John Hinckley tried to kill Reagan just to impress a teenaged actress.

On another thought that just makes me ill, Obama and McCain have raised a combined $700 million! Just think what good could have been done if we had let each guy spend $100 million, leaving half a BILLION dollars to spend on education, homelessness, cancer research, etc, etc.

Posted by: Annie H. at October 10, 2008 1:59 PM

Zel, to my knowledge, those leftist spoonheads who love to plaster the internet with conspiracy theories are not at Obama rallies shouting "Terrorist!" and "Kill him!" about McCain.

There is no way you can assert that if some assassination attempt is !!!god forbid!!! made, that it won't be made by a Republican or right-winger. I don't see how you can make such a baseless assertion. No one can know what might happen.

What we *can* do is hope that the positively shameless baiting that anyone can see IS happening at these McCain rallies will not foment violent acts. We can also speak out against these shameless and irresponsible tactics. That is Ian's point. The whipping up of mobs into angry frenzies is dangerous. If McCain tried to contain or condemn these outbursts of hate, I would have some renewed respect for him. But no attempt at containment or condemnation has been made. Which rather leads one to think that McCain might not give a shit whether people scream out about killing Obama at his rallies. Which is fucking scary.

I would hope that Obama, were one of his supporters to scream out "Kill him!" about McCain, would speak out against it. Knowing what I know about Obama, I believe that he would.

What I can say without doubt is that Obama has not resorted to implying that McCain is a terrorist--he has barely even referred to the Keating 5 scandal. Because he has an actual campaign that is reaching people, he doesn't need to fall back on baiting people's worst instincts.

Honestly, in my heart of hearts, I believe that McPalin at best, *at best* don't care whether or not people at their rallies voice homicidal intentions towards Obama. And I find that appalling.

(I had not heard the Sandra Bernhard quote, but it sounds reprehensible to me)

Posted by: Annie H. at October 10, 2008 2:01 PM

Oh jesus...check THIS out:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081010/ap_on_el_pr/osama_ballot

Posted by: kjf at October 10, 2008 3:37 PM

http://pa.lindro.me/

Posted by: Anne at October 10, 2008 6:01 PM

Someone sent this to me today. It fits perfectly with Ian's topic and my opinion:

By Frank Schaeffer
(This post first ran in the Baltimore Sun as an op-ed on Oct 10, 2008)
http://tinyurl.com/4jyfux

Senator John McCain: If your campaign does not stop equating Sen. Barack Obama with terrorism, questioning his patriotism and portraying Mr. Obama as "not one of us," I accuse you of deliberately feeding the most unhinged elements of our society the red meat of hate, and therefore of potentially instigating violence.

At a Sarah Palin rally, someone called out, "Kill him!" At one of your rallies, someone called out, "Terrorist!" Neither was answered or denounced
by you or your running mate, as the crowd laughed and cheered. At your campaign event Wednesday in Bethlehem, Pa., the crowd was seething with hatred for the Democratic nominee - an attitude encouraged in speeches there by you, your running mate, your wife and the local Republican chairman.

Shame!

John McCain: In 2000, as a lifelong Republican, I worked to get you elected instead of George W. Bush. In return, you wrote an endorsement of one of my books about military service. You seemed to be a man who put principle ahead of mere political gain.

You have changed. You have a choice: Go down in history as a decent senator and an honorable military man with many successes, or go down in history as the latest abettor of right-wing extremist hate.

John McCain, you are no fool, and you understand the depths of hatred that surround the issue of race in this country. You also know that, post-9/11, to call someone a friend of a terrorist is a very serious matter. You also know we are a bitterly divided country on many other issues. You know that, sadly, in America, violence is always just a moment away. You know that there are plenty of crazy people out there.

John McCain, you're walking a perilous line. If you do not stand up for all that is good in America and declare that Senator Obama is a patriot, fit for office, and denounce your hate-filled supporters when they scream out "Terrorist" or "Kill him," history will hold you responsible for all that follows.

John McCain and Sarah Palin, you are playing with fire, and you know it. You are unleashing the monster of American hatred and prejudice, to the peril of all of us. You are doing this in wartime. You are doing this as our economy collapses. You are doing this in a country with a history of assassinations.

Change the atmosphere of your campaign. Talk about the issues at hand. Make your case. But stop stirring up the lunatic fringe of haters, or risk suffering the judgment of history and the loathing of the American people - forever.

We will hold you responsible.

Posted by: Ruth at October 10, 2008 6:31 PM

I just wanted to share this article w/this community: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2008/oct/03/sarah.palin.debate.feminism

Posted by: Ian at October 10, 2008 11:28 PM

Zel, I absolutely know what I'm writing. There is a huge difference between a fucking Sandra Bernhard quote nobody has ever heard, and a mob of angry Americans gathering in every state to foment racism and hatred with the tacit and complicit approval of the candidates. Please don't equate the two - it's a disingenuity that is beneath you.

I understand that Americans are deeply frustrated, we all are, I sure as hell am. But questioning patriotism, allowing violent epithets to go unchecked, playing with this kind of fire when people are so desperate? That's the Republican side, not ours. Let's just call this what it is, and assign responsibility.

Posted by: Triangleheel at October 11, 2008 6:04 AM

We should let McCain off the hook- he made a lame effort Friday to stop the tide by saying Obama was "decent".

Let's see how the next few days play out. McCain could actually turn back into a human again. Doubtful... just read this and watch the video.
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/23316912/makebelieve_maverick/print

Walks like a sailor, talks like a sailor.

Posted by: Melissa at October 11, 2008 8:17 AM

McCain doesn't get off the hook just because he's suddenly like, "Oops, these people are REALLY crazy--guess I better back up a little." I agree, Ian, they are stoking the nutso fire in an alarming and dangerous way.

On a happier note, I'm feeling prickles of pride that NC might be in play. Going down soon and hope to talk to some folks about Obama.

Posted by: Salem at October 11, 2008 8:37 AM

Anyone who thinks that John McCain did not review every word of Sarah Palin's and Cindy's rally speeches, should withdraw their support based on gross negligence. Pres politics has to be one of the most calculated and tightly managed processes on earth. If he allowed this to happen without being aware, what is going to happen in his administration?

I believe his comments to supporters yesterday were probably instructions from a handler, but I have to give him credit for decipline on that one. I have never seen any politician insult or burst the bubble of an insanely enthusiastic group of HIS supporters. That was like watching David Duke introduce his Jewish boyfriend at a Klan rally.

Posted by: Zel M. at October 12, 2008 6:02 AM

I'll try this one more time, but it's hard to deal with people when they're in such a hyperbolic frenzy.

Idiots are everywhere. The disingenuity is to somehow assert that one side has a monopoly on them. Can you interview 100 people going into a GOP rally, select five who are spoonheads and place it on YouTube as representative of everyone going into the place? You betcha. (Wink)

I looked at the links you posted. From the "kill him" entry, it was hard to tell if that was directed at Ayers or Obama. And the "fury that begets" link was a nice editing job. The guy in the crowd calls Obama AND Pelosi "hooligans" in a 3-minute diatribe, and McCain says "he's right" and the scene jumps in mid-sentence to Palin. And all Palin did was tell the crowd to ask the questions the "mainstream media" wouldn't.

Please tell me you're not from the Douglass Daniel camp, implying that all criticism of Obama MUST be racially motivated, and that by using the word "terrorist" a connection is made between dark-skinned terrorists and the dark-skinned presidential candidate. The connection most spoonheads make, as illustrated by the picture in your post, is by his name, not by his skin color.

You of all people should know what true racial politics looks like. You were in NC for the Helms/Gantt Senate race. Stirring up anti-black sentiment is not, as you state, whipping the masses into a fury. It's getting white folks to think that African-Americans are going to take their jobs, or impact their livelihood or safety. That's the Helms affirmative action ads, or the Willie Horton campaign. Say what you want, but McPalin hasn't pulled that out - at least not yet. They are desperate, you know.

And please tell me you did not dismiss Sandra Bernhard's comment simply because "no one heard it". I offer it simply as proof that the left is as full of vitriol as the right. And she was not some nameless, faceless voice shouting at a rally. She is someone with a microphone and a name that at least someone heard of, at one time, maybe...

Then again, maybe instead of shouting the "kill him" at a rally, that guy should have written a book about fantasizing about an Obama assassination. Or better yet, made a movie about it for British TV. Wait, those aren't original ideas, are they.

Speaking of British TV, thanks for the recommendation of "Life on Mars". I watched the American version of it this week.

Posted by: Schultz at October 12, 2008 12:55 PM

I'm sorry.....did someone mention ACORN????

http://www.nypost.com/seven/10102008/news/politics/1_voter__72_registrations_132965.htm


I'm not posting this to incite a riot....I just can't believe this stuff happens in America. I'm sure there is something equally disturbing from the right..

Posted by: modatoi at April 13, 2013 12:05 AM

Camaraderie is a Coptis trifolia groenlandica the fact neckties a new kisses of all the marketplace. modatoi http://ruenee.com/

Post a comment





(We won't show it.)




Remember personal info?